Michigan Tech’s 2021 Diversity Award winner Sonia Goltz shares her commitment to diversity
in teaching, research and service — and how she maintains a healthy perspective.
“Doing the easy things will not move us forward,” says Sonia Goltz, a Michigan Technological
University College of Business faculty member whose research focuses on gender equity issues and related topics
— including social power and equity. She shares the 2021 award with Amy Lyn Howard, a doctoral candidate in Michigan Tech’s rhetoric, theory, and culture program who recently served as interim director of MTU’s Center for Diversity and Inclusion.
About the Award
Established in 2014, Michigan Tech’s Diversity Award showcases faculty and staff who
demonstrate exemplary commitment to initiatives that forward diversity and inclusion.
Their contributions come in many forms, including recruitment, retention, teaching,
research, multicultural programming, cultural competency and community outreach.
The Diversity Award winner receives a $2,500 award and is honored during the annual
faculty awards celebration in September.
All are welcome to submit Diversity Award nominations, which are due by late May each year.
Goltz is one of the core members of ADVANCE: Organizational Change for Gender Equity in STEM Academic Professions, a multifaceted
National Science Foundation (NSF) initiative established on the Michigan Tech campus in 2008 that focuses on supporting the career
progress of women and minority faculty in the STEM areas.
A professor of organizational behavior, Goltz has been recognized for bringing innovation to the classroom through the use of new and emerging teaching
methods and tools. “Dr. Goltz clearly demonstrates activities to attract, recruit
and ensure the success of a diverse student body,” writes nominator Andrew Storer,
dean of the College of Forest Resources and Environmental Science and a co-principal investigator for the ADVANCE Initiative at Michigan Tech.
In this Q&A, learn more about Goltz’s work, why it’s important to her and how it impacts the University and
the greater community.
“There is no doubt that Dr. Goltz demonstrates efforts that exhibit a commitment to
diversity in teaching, research and service. Her research and scholarship focus on
DEI (diversity, equity and inclusion) issues or bring DEI issues to other areas of
her scholarship. Her classes help students recognize issues of equity and how organizations
can work to address such complex issues, and her service to the University always
represents a commitment to equity and ethical standards.”
Q: What’s your personal definition of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI)?
SG: Organizations often seek to increase diversity without increasing equity and inclusion,
which just results in a revolving door, meaning that certain groups do not feel supported
or valued and leave in greater numbers. I have gone through that revolving door myself.
I was hired to replace another woman who didn’t receive tenure. After I left, they
hired a woman to replace me. It didn’t feel good. I felt like we were hired as tokens
and left to survive on our own with little support; at the same time, the bar was
set higher. So, by supported, I mean everyone should receive sufficient resources
to do their jobs in an equitable way, and also they should receive equitable outcomes
for doing them. By valued, I mean heard and not discounted or ignored, and also appreciated
for what they bring to the table in terms of ideas, talents and skills. Ultimately,
the concept of DEI boils down to creating a situation in which everyone can be seen
and heard equally, jointly contribute individual talents to the group’s efforts and
create a larger good that reaps equitable recognition and rewards for their contributions.
This all sounds easy enough but there are multiple barriers to achieving it.
“Dr. Goltz is a lifelong champion of diversity and inclusion. The extensive list of
her accomplishments and contributions to our campus climate span her entire career.
Dr. Goltz has both the visionary leadership to implement systemic University-wide
diversity programs and the willingness to do the hard work at the grassroots level
to foster change.”
Q: What is the work you do specifically related to DEI?
SG: Much of the work has been research-related. Several papers focus specifically
on equity at universities, including some that explore the issues, some about introducing
programming and some that suggest creating or using equity indices. I have also published
work in legal journals examining how well the legal system recognizes and addresses
discrimination. There are also a couple of articles on gender and entrepreneurship.
Indirectly, my research led to working on the ADVANCE grant proposals in part because of the knowledge I had built up from doing the research. At the end
of the ADVANCE PAID grant, I helped develop the Diversity Literacy training for faculty.
On the ADVANCE Adaptation grant, I work with Patty Sotirin (Department of Humanities) on the Advanced Career Management (ACM) initiative, which provides associate professors
with career-related resources, primarily mentoring. I also work on other aspects of
the project with the entire PI team, which includes Patty, Andrew Sotirin and Adrienne
Minerick, along with the grant’s evaluation team, which includes Karen Colbert and
Betsy Lehman. On the ADVANCE Midwest Partnership grant, which is shared across four
institutions, but led by Cinzia Cervato at Iowa State, Patty and I work on identifying
synergies among the partnership initiatives and pulling together the portfolio of
initiatives so that other institutions in the Midwest can more easily adapt and adopt
Q: Difficult conversations around DEI topics — topics some perceive as uncomfortable
or even controversial — aren’t new. But it feels like the volume was definitely turned
up this year on our campus. How do you approach the tough dialogues? What do uncomfortable
conversations teach us?
SG: In general, the uncomfortable conversations our campus has witnessed have surfaced
a lot of things that were already there and mostly hidden. Perhaps it is essential
to us moving forward. I try to keep in mind the bigger picture of what is achievable
and try to persist in changing things where they can be changed. As we all know, some
conversations won’t move things much because you are dealing with a hardened view;
other conversations will. Having conversations with those who are uncertain and want
information is the kind of conversation I am happy to engage in.
“Sometimes it is not who in the conversations, but who is listening to them and what
they are learning from them that is important. Finally, as we all know, it is behavior,
not talk, that ultimately matters: sometimes the needed behavior doesn’t follow from
all the right talk.”
Q: Your nomination includes the research you’ve conducted and published. What drew
you to this field of research? Are you working on anything now?
SG: My personal experiences did. I began research on the topic because I had a need
to understand what I was experiencing as a professor in academia. In my first study
on the topic, I went all over the U.S. and interviewed women who had sued their universities
for discrimination. More recently, I have been interested in the concepts of freedom
and power as it relates to achieving equity. I also write about the topic of organizational
change as it relates to equity initiatives.
“For the past 25 years, Dr. Goltz has devoted tremendous time, energy, and creativity
to addressing issues of advancement, equity, fairness and respect. Her scholarship
makes a sustained contribution to the literature on DEI in academe. Her career contributions
to transformative University change are substantial, enduring and sincere. And her
fierce dedication to DEI work is inspiring.”
Q: You’re among the core group carrying out the NSF-funded ADVANCE Initiative. When was
ADVANCE established? Can you touch on the various aspects, and tell us which have
been particularly impactful — and where more needs to be done?
SG: NSF began awarding the ADVANCE grant in 2001. ADVANCE at Michigan Tech started with the PAID grant in 2008, brought in by then-Provost Lesley Lovett-Doust,
which focused mostly on bringing in more women in STEM to faculty positions on our
campus. It was successful in meeting this objective, but when there are high turnover
rates, attracting people is not sufficient. So in our Adaptation grant, we have focused
more on retention.
The idea of an Adaptation grant is to introduce initiatives designed and tested elsewhere.
Our ECM (Early Career Management) committees on campus were based on University of
Michigan’s LAUNCH program, which is for untenured faculty. The ECM program here began
prior to our Adaptation grant, but arose from the preparations we did for our grant
proposal. The ECMs were almost immediately successful, both in terms of clear beneficial
outcomes and increasing demand from department chairs, so that was very encouraging.
Our ACM program is part of the Adaptation grant and is modeled on U of M’s LIFT. We
have affinity groups of three to four associate professors each from across campus
— seven groups total this year. Each group is guided by a full professor and explores
midcareer topics. We also have introduced the Advocates and Allies (A&A) program, modeled after North Dakota’s State’s A&A program, which is specifically
tailored to majority-identifying faculty — generally cis men — who are interesting
in learning more and helping change campus structures and culture to remove barriers
The third initiative, Academy for Responsive Leadership, is modeled after Iowa State’s
program for department chairs in which they receive both basic training on being a
chair and a later training specifically about equity issues. Similarly, our initiative
provides modules and other resources that complement the chair training being developed
by the Provost’s Office on campus. All of these initiatives are described on our ADVANCE website.
To answer the question about impact, what we are finding through our experiences on
campus, which is also consistent with research, is that one program cannot get you
equity. It is too easily dismissed or forgotten. Also, introducing just one program
in an organization to reach a goal often signals to employees that the goal is not
important. It’s a mistake, for example, to think training everyone on the concepts
will get us there. There has to be a concerted, multipronged effort. Each equity program
needs to support the other equity programs. The advantage of the Partnership grant is that we have institutions with the same goals supporting each other with ideas,
programming and materials. We started small and are building. We have a long way to
go, but the momentum is picking up. Some things are easier than others. It was easy
to create programs to bring more women in, for example (PAID grant), but has been
exceedingly difficult to change the culture in order to be able to retain them, particularly
in some units on campus. But changing the culture is going to have the most impact.
“Our ADVANCE programs are a stimulus, a beginning. There is a lot more sustained effort
that will be needed. But I have seen people all over campus begin to step up to the
challenge and I’m actually quite optimistic we will eventually get where we need to
be, although clearly we needed to be there yesterday.”
Q: What (or who) inspires you to dedicate time to improving DEI at Michigan Tech, and
across the state and nation?
SG: Nationally and internationally, I admire the leaders who advocate for social justice
in a very visible way but I also admire the writers, social scientists and philosophers
who help us think more deeply about the issues. I have relied on many of them in my
research. Even more, though, I am inspired by all the unsung heroes working in the
trenches with no fame associated with their efforts. There are many of these on our
campus. I would say this year, I was inspired particularly by some of our University senators.
There are women who started work on DEI at Michigan Tech well before me who set an
example for me and others. Sue Beske-Diehl worked for 15 years to get day care on
campus — she continued even after her own children had grown. Chris Anderson and Betty Chavis created programming and also kept DEI on people’s radar for years during a time when
many of our leaders on campus would rather not have to think about it. Peg Gale, one of the first women deans on campus, helped manage the first ADVANCE grant.
Q: Diversity, equity and inclusion are as much a part of the public dialogue as they’ve
ever been. We’re at a moment in time when there’s a discernible shift in acknowledging
systemic racism and taking action to make permanent change. How can we as a campus
community move forward?
SG: We need transparency and accountability and also we need to change things in partnership
with each other. Whatever it takes, we need to do it together, even if it is difficult,
and guess what? It is going to be difficult. Doing just the easy things will not move
us forward. This is true with anything in life. Right now, I sense there are many
people ready to help implement changes, which is good because the composition of the
United States is rapidly changing and Tech still has much work to do in terms of student
and faculty composition as well as creating a culture of inclusion. It is going to
take leadership throughout campus to move us forward.
“Dr. Goltz reflects on looking up some of her former students on LinkedIn and notes
that she ‘realized how successful they had all become in different ways. They had
found jobs that fit them within the management field. They looked happy and were doing
well.’ She also reflects that ‘Ultimately, we are trying to have a positive impact
on the rest of people’s lives. So I am trying to hold that in awareness during day-to-day
activities.’ Dr. Goltz certainly does hold that in awareness and deserves the recognition
that this award will go some way to provide.”
Q: It’s been a year. Advocates, activists and educators are feeling both the impetus
and the workload of moving forward to address DEI issues in impactful ways — particularly
during a pandemic. How did the pandemic affect your work?
SG: The pandemic stymied our ability to offer some of our ADVANCE programs, particularly
for the A&A initiative. We had to be resourceful and pursue some unplanned opportunities/programming.
At the same time, the pandemic brought into stark relief the inequities in our country,
creating more impetus for addressing them. The importance of having adequate child
care, particularly for working women, comes to mind, but also the inequities in terms
of the distribution of health care, the ability to work from home and the financial
resources to make it through a pandemic. Seeing these things more clearly helped motivate
some people to do more about inequity. As a result, I have come out of the pandemic
with even more awareness that change is not linear and doesn’t always go according
to plan. Also, often the unplanned opportunities, including changes in social awareness/motivation,
are where more success will be achieved.
Q: In challenging times or any time, self-care is vital for health and happiness.
What do you do to relax? Do you have a favorite creative outlet or guilty pleasure?
SG: I agree that self-care is critically important. Guilty pleasures: I read a lot
— mostly news, and I can get glued to my iPad; I watch home improvement shows; I eat
ice cream and other sweets. Not-so-guilty pleasures: Yoga helps center and relax me,
besides being good for my health. Regular spiritual study and practice helps lift
me beyond being small and petty. I am very happy when I garden. Finally, laughter
and play helps, and for that I have grandchildren I spend time with. They help me
keep everything in perspective.
Q: What’s one thing we can do today to further equity and inclusion on campus and
in our community?
SG: The one thing we each can do today and each and every day to further equity and
inclusion and just improve our own lives in general is to get to really know someone
in all their humanness, warts and diamonds. Then we can wonder at the amazing person
they are and why we never saw that before. Verna Myers puts it well in her TED Talk,
“Walk Boldly Towards Them.” We need to move toward our discomfort and toward difference and get to know people
holistically rather than through our own incomplete or mistaken concepts of them.
We need to continually examine and challenge our own perceptions.
Michigan Technological University is a public research university founded in 1885 in Houghton, Michigan, and is home to more than 6,800 students from 60 countries around the world. Consistently ranked among the best universities in the country for return on investment, the University offers more than 125 undergraduate and graduate degree programs in science and technology, engineering, computing, forestry, business and economics, health professions, humanities, mathematics, social sciences, and the arts. The rural campus is situated just miles from Lake Superior in Michigan’s Upper Peninsula, offering year-round opportunities for outdoor adventure.