A 4.34 billion euro (A$6.95) European Union antitrust fine was based on flawed calculations, Alphabet’s Google claimed on Thursday, urging Europe’s second-maximum courtroom to scrap or minimize what it reported was not an ideal penalty.

Google was fined for making use of its Android cell functioning process to thwart rivals and cement its dominance in basic online lookup from 2011, in the most significant penalty meted out to any enterprise identified responsible of breaching EU antitrust regulations.

“The wonderful that was imposed, a staggering 4.34 billion euros, was not ideal,” Google’s attorney Genevra Forwood advised the five-judge panel of the Typical Court on the fourth day of a 7 days-very long listening to, which is having put a few many years soon after the European Commission sanctioned the company.

“The trouble is not the headline-grabbing wonderful per se. The dilemma is how the commission arrived at that figure,” she claimed.

Forwood claimed there was no anti-competitive intent in Google’s steps nor could it have regarded that its conduct was an abuse centered on EU case regulation and there was no precedent for it.

“So it was incorrect for the fee to impose any fine at all, enable by itself convert up the dials to achieve its largest wonderful at any time,” Forwood mentioned.

She also took challenge with the EU competitiveness enforcer adding a 11 per cent gravity factor to Google’s fantastic as opposed with 5 percent for Intel in 2009 in a individual case.

“Even if this Courtroom considers that a fantastic is correct, it would only be right to switch the dials ideal down,” she explained.

Having said that, the European Commission’s lawyer Anthony Dawes claimed Google “simply could not be unaware of the anti-competitive behaviour of its methods”.

“Infringements dedicated negligently are no significantly less serious than those fully commited intentionally,” Dawes mentioned, incorporating that the high-quality was just 4.5 % of Google’s income in 2017 vs . a 10 percent cap allowed beneath EU policies.

A verdict is likely to occur subsequent yr.